How does this relate to the existing buckles-law.co.uk WordPress site?
It is a single-page rebuild of the /offices/solicitors-in-stamford/ route, designed to be lifted into the existing firm-wide site as a standalone Stamford office page (the other six offices keep their current page). Two options on hand-over: (a) port the rebuild back into a WordPress template that matches, so the firm-wide CMS keeps editing rights, or (b) host the Stamford page on the Astro/Vercel build and 301 the old URL to it. Either way the rest of the firm-wide buckles-law.co.uk site is left alone. The Stamford page is the unit of work, not the whole firm.
Why a Stamford-only rebuild rather than a firm-wide one?
Because the Stamford office has the most to gain. Multi-office solicitors are bought one office at a time: a Stamford homeowner instructing a will is not comparing Buckles Stamford to Buckles Cambridge, they are comparing it to the independent solicitor on Broad Street. The firm-wide template flattens that office-by-office competition. Fixing Stamford first costs a fraction of a firm-wide rebuild and shows whether the structure (Partner-above-the-fold, schema-on-the-office-page, the building in the hero) lifts the Stamford office’s share of "solicitors Stamford" / "probate Lincolnshire" / "LPA PE9" search results. If it does, the same structure ports to the other six.
What schema, exactly, gets added?
A single LegalService + LocalBusiness JSON-LD block on the Stamford office page with full PostalAddress (3 St Mary’s Hill, PE9 2DW), telephone in E.164 (+441780484570), email (StamfordEnquiries@buckles-law.co.uk), opening hours, and SRA Organisation 419965 as a credentialed identifier. Five Person entries (Sarah Westwood, Andrea Harrod, Alex Hartnoll, Charles Sinclair, Charlotte Bradford) with their direct-dial telephones, roles and qualifying years where known. Four Service entries (Wills/Probate/Estates, LPAs/care-home fees, Family, Cross-border Private Client). A FAQPage entry for the five questions on the page itself. The firm-wide Organization stays where it is; this is additive, not replacing.
How do you handle the Private Client weighting honestly without insulting the Family practice?
The team is four Private Client lawyers (Westwood, Harrod, Sinclair, Bradford) and one Family practitioner (Hartnoll), and that is the desk that exists, and reflecting it honestly serves both the buyer and the firm. The rebuild leads with Private Client because that is most of what walks through the door. Family is presented as a single named practitioner with Resolution membership and the actual scope (divorce, financial remedies, pre-nuptial agreements, cohabitation, child arrangements) , not as a token bullet. A reader looking for divorce advice meets Alex Hartnoll on his own card with his actual qualification and his direct dial, not a thin generic line.
What does "fixed fee" cover and what is excluded?
£2,000 covers the full Stamford-office-page rebuild as described above: hero, team cards, service grid, heritage band, FAQ, visit block with embedded map, full JSON-LD, meta and og tags, one round of revisions before publish, DNS / route handover. £150 per month covers ongoing hosting on Vercel (or the WP-port equivalent), monthly schema review as the team changes, security updates, monthly analytics email and one editorial change per month included. Excluded: firm-wide rebrand work, the other six office pages, the firm-wide site navigation, and any content the SRA/B-Corp wants restructured. If the rebuild lands and the firm wants the same treatment for Cambridge or Peterborough, that is a separate scope at the same fixed-fee rate.